Gerrymandering and Compactness: Implementation Flexibility and Abuse
نویسندگان
چکیده
The shape of an electoral district may suggest whether it was drawn with political motivations, or gerrymandered. For this reason, quantifying the shape of districts, in particular their compactness, is a key task in politics and civil rights. A growing body of literature suggests and analyzes compactness measures mathematically, but little consideration has been given to how these scores should be calculated in practice. Here, we consider the effects of a number of decisions that must be made in interpreting and implementing a set of popular compactness scores. We show that the choices made in quantifying compactness may themselves become political tools, with seemingly innocuous decisions leading to disparate scores. We show that when the full range of implementation flexibility is used, it can be abused to make clearly gerrymandered districts appear quantitatively reasonable. This complicates using compactness as a legislative or judicial standard to counteract unfair redistricting practices. This paper accompanies the release of packages in C++, Python, and R which correctly, efficiently, and reproducibly calculate a variety of compactness scores.
منابع مشابه
An Efficient Measure of Compactness for 2D Shapes and its Application in Regionalization Problems
A measure of shape compactness is a numerical quantity representing the degree to which a shape is compact. Ways to provide an accurate measure have been given great attention due to its application in a broad range of GIS problems, such as detecting clustering patterns from remote sensing images, understanding urban sprawl, and redrawing electoral districts to avoid gerrymandering. In this pap...
متن کاملExamples that illustrate how compactness and respect for political boundaries can lead to partisan bias when redistricting
To reduce the unfairness incurred by partisan districting, citizen reformers usually advocate applying the conventional criteria of compactness and respect for political boundaries of subdivisions. Simple examples are constructed to address whether optimizing these criteria also minimizes partisan bias, measured as the difference between the seats-votes curves for the two parties. One set of ex...
متن کاملUsing Legislative Districting Simulations to Measure Electoral Bias in Legislatures
When one of the major parties in the United States wins a substantially larger share of the seats than its vote share would seem to warrant, the conventional explanation lies in overt partisan or racial gerrymandering. Yet this paper uses a unique data set from Florida to demonstrate a common mechanism through which substantial partisan bias can emerge purely from residential patterns. When par...
متن کاملPartisan and Bipartisan Gerrymandering∗
This paper analyzes the optimal partisan and bipartisan gerrymandering policies in a model with electoral competitions in policy positions and transfer promises. With complete freedom in redistricting, partisan gerrymandering policy generates the most one-sidedly biased district profile, while bipartisan gerrymandering generates the most polarized district profile. In contrast, with limited fre...
متن کامل